While doing what it does best, “Consumer Reports” magazine tested a number different sorts of wrinkle creams for efficacy. This research, including many hundred ladies aged thirty to seventy, was conducted over a 12-week period in 2006. While there’s no way that studies such as this can be anything except objective, the article that was at last made public by the magazine made some interesting points when discussing Consumer Reports Wrinkle Cream test results.
We’ve all been brought up to believe that dearer means better, but that doesn’t appear to be the wrinkle creams tested in the Consumer Reports study. In truth, one of the costliest creams employed In fact, one of the most costly creams used in the study ($ 335 for 1-oz. Of day cream and 1.7-oz. of night cream) was one of the least effective creams tested. In their estimation, the best cream was Olay Regenerist which can be bought moderately at any drug or cut price store.
It was found that every cream in the study had an effect on at least some of the girls which led analysts to believe that no-one cream is going to work best on every woman. This is because skin is a living organism, and no 2 girls have exactly the same metabolic make-up. However, none of the creams had a major effect on any of the girls. In reality, the test results were so minimal that they couldn’t accurately be measured, even employing a high-tech measuring device that might detect differences as tiny as 1/6000.
It’s engaging to notice the report revealed no link between the active ingredients that were in the creams and their efficacy. The conjecture was that all the inactive materials that were included in the creams prevented the absorption of the creams into the skin cells. The sole mark that all of the creams had in common was that they did a good job of moisturizing facial tissues.
The bottom line of this report was that not one of the creams made enough of a difference in the appearance of facial skin to be seen with the naked eye. Basically, it was impossible for the ladies to exactly judge the results of a product on their skin, because that effect was so minimal. Although it’s a great idea to keep moisturizing cream of some kind on your skin all the time from your early 20s on, there’s just no evidence from the Patron Reports Wrinkle Cream tests that any anti-wrinkle cream is worth what you’ve got to pay for it.
Keep in mind this was only one study and that other studies might have come up with different results. There is no wizardry answer to the problem of what cream is going to work best for you. You can learn from the Consumer Reports Wrinkle Cream tests, and end up saving some money in the bargain. Since the dear creams were no more effective than the cheaper, drugstore brands, you may as well go with something less expensive. That may leave you with some extra money, so let’s go shopping!.